Fixes for indentation and local variable names.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -217,78 +217,78 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(anchors_flush_test)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(chained_pours)
|
||||
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(chained_joinsplits)
|
||||
{
|
||||
CCoinsViewTest base;
|
||||
CCoinsViewCacheTest cache(&base);
|
||||
|
||||
ZCIncrementalMerkleTree tree;
|
||||
|
||||
JSDescription ptx1;
|
||||
ptx1.anchor = tree.root();
|
||||
ptx1.commitments[0] = appendRandomCommitment(tree);
|
||||
ptx1.commitments[1] = appendRandomCommitment(tree);
|
||||
JSDescription js1;
|
||||
js1.anchor = tree.root();
|
||||
js1.commitments[0] = appendRandomCommitment(tree);
|
||||
js1.commitments[1] = appendRandomCommitment(tree);
|
||||
|
||||
// Although it's not possible given our assumptions, if
|
||||
// two pours create the same treestate twice, we should
|
||||
// two joinsplits create the same treestate twice, we should
|
||||
// still be able to anchor to it.
|
||||
JSDescription ptx1b;
|
||||
ptx1b.anchor = tree.root();
|
||||
ptx1b.commitments[0] = ptx1.commitments[0];
|
||||
ptx1b.commitments[1] = ptx1.commitments[1];
|
||||
JSDescription js1b;
|
||||
js1b.anchor = tree.root();
|
||||
js1b.commitments[0] = js1.commitments[0];
|
||||
js1b.commitments[1] = js1.commitments[1];
|
||||
|
||||
JSDescription ptx2;
|
||||
JSDescription ptx3;
|
||||
JSDescription js2;
|
||||
JSDescription js3;
|
||||
|
||||
ptx2.anchor = tree.root();
|
||||
ptx3.anchor = tree.root();
|
||||
js2.anchor = tree.root();
|
||||
js3.anchor = tree.root();
|
||||
|
||||
ptx2.commitments[0] = appendRandomCommitment(tree);
|
||||
ptx2.commitments[1] = appendRandomCommitment(tree);
|
||||
js2.commitments[0] = appendRandomCommitment(tree);
|
||||
js2.commitments[1] = appendRandomCommitment(tree);
|
||||
|
||||
ptx3.commitments[0] = appendRandomCommitment(tree);
|
||||
ptx3.commitments[1] = appendRandomCommitment(tree);
|
||||
js3.commitments[0] = appendRandomCommitment(tree);
|
||||
js3.commitments[1] = appendRandomCommitment(tree);
|
||||
|
||||
{
|
||||
CMutableTransaction mtx;
|
||||
mtx.vjoinsplit.push_back(ptx2);
|
||||
mtx.vjoinsplit.push_back(js2);
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(!cache.HaveJoinSplitRequirements(mtx));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
{
|
||||
// ptx2 is trying to anchor to ptx1 but ptx1
|
||||
// js2 is trying to anchor to js1 but js1
|
||||
// appears afterwards -- not a permitted ordering
|
||||
CMutableTransaction mtx;
|
||||
mtx.vjoinsplit.push_back(ptx2);
|
||||
mtx.vjoinsplit.push_back(ptx1);
|
||||
mtx.vjoinsplit.push_back(js2);
|
||||
mtx.vjoinsplit.push_back(js1);
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(!cache.HaveJoinSplitRequirements(mtx));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
{
|
||||
CMutableTransaction mtx;
|
||||
mtx.vjoinsplit.push_back(ptx1);
|
||||
mtx.vjoinsplit.push_back(ptx2);
|
||||
mtx.vjoinsplit.push_back(js1);
|
||||
mtx.vjoinsplit.push_back(js2);
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(cache.HaveJoinSplitRequirements(mtx));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
{
|
||||
CMutableTransaction mtx;
|
||||
mtx.vjoinsplit.push_back(ptx1);
|
||||
mtx.vjoinsplit.push_back(ptx2);
|
||||
mtx.vjoinsplit.push_back(ptx3);
|
||||
mtx.vjoinsplit.push_back(js1);
|
||||
mtx.vjoinsplit.push_back(js2);
|
||||
mtx.vjoinsplit.push_back(js3);
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(cache.HaveJoinSplitRequirements(mtx));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
{
|
||||
CMutableTransaction mtx;
|
||||
mtx.vjoinsplit.push_back(ptx1);
|
||||
mtx.vjoinsplit.push_back(ptx1b);
|
||||
mtx.vjoinsplit.push_back(ptx2);
|
||||
mtx.vjoinsplit.push_back(ptx3);
|
||||
mtx.vjoinsplit.push_back(js1);
|
||||
mtx.vjoinsplit.push_back(js1b);
|
||||
mtx.vjoinsplit.push_back(js2);
|
||||
mtx.vjoinsplit.push_back(js3);
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(cache.HaveJoinSplitRequirements(mtx));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user