Rename *ViewingKey* -> *SproutViewingKey*
This commit is contained in:
@@ -117,8 +117,8 @@ TEST(keystore_tests, StoreAndRetrieveViewingKey) {
|
||||
auto addr = sk.address();
|
||||
|
||||
// Sanity-check: we can't get a viewing key we haven't added
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(keyStore.HaveViewingKey(addr));
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(keyStore.GetViewingKey(addr, vkOut));
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(keyStore.HaveSproutViewingKey(addr));
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(keyStore.GetSproutViewingKey(addr, vkOut));
|
||||
|
||||
// and we shouldn't have a spending key or decryptor either
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(keyStore.HaveSpendingKey(addr));
|
||||
@@ -130,9 +130,9 @@ TEST(keystore_tests, StoreAndRetrieveViewingKey) {
|
||||
keyStore.GetPaymentAddresses(addresses);
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(addresses.count(addr));
|
||||
|
||||
keyStore.AddViewingKey(vk);
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(keyStore.HaveViewingKey(addr));
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(keyStore.GetViewingKey(addr, vkOut));
|
||||
keyStore.AddSproutViewingKey(vk);
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(keyStore.HaveSproutViewingKey(addr));
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(keyStore.GetSproutViewingKey(addr, vkOut));
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(vk, vkOut);
|
||||
|
||||
// We should still not have the spending key...
|
||||
@@ -148,9 +148,9 @@ TEST(keystore_tests, StoreAndRetrieveViewingKey) {
|
||||
keyStore.GetPaymentAddresses(addresses);
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(addresses.count(addr));
|
||||
|
||||
keyStore.RemoveViewingKey(vk);
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(keyStore.HaveViewingKey(addr));
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(keyStore.GetViewingKey(addr, vkOut));
|
||||
keyStore.RemoveSproutViewingKey(vk);
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(keyStore.HaveSproutViewingKey(addr));
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(keyStore.GetSproutViewingKey(addr, vkOut));
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(keyStore.HaveSpendingKey(addr));
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(keyStore.GetSpendingKey(addr, skOut));
|
||||
addresses.clear();
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user