DragonX/dragonx
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases 2 Wiki Activity

Latest Zcash updates

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
miketout
2018-09-20 13:32:57 -07:00
parent 75cd5b6b80 36243f41f1
commit 644c7445ec
38 changed files with 996 additions and 515 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

15
src/gtest/test_checktransaction.cpp
View File

@@ -506,8 +506,11 @@ TEST(checktransaction_tests, bad_txns_invalid_joinsplit_signature) {
CTransaction tx(mtx);
MockCValidationState state;
// during initial block download, DoS ban score should be zero, else 100
EXPECT_CALL(state, DoS(0, false, REJECT_INVALID, "bad-txns-invalid-joinsplit-signature", false)).Times(1);
ContextualCheckTransaction(tx, state, 0, 100);
ContextualCheckTransaction(tx, state, 0, 100, []() { return true; });
EXPECT_CALL(state, DoS(100, false, REJECT_INVALID, "bad-txns-invalid-joinsplit-signature", false)).Times(1);
ContextualCheckTransaction(tx, state, 0, 100, []() { return false; });
}
TEST(checktransaction_tests, non_canonical_ed25519_signature) {
@@ -539,8 +542,11 @@ TEST(checktransaction_tests, non_canonical_ed25519_signature) {
CTransaction tx(mtx);
MockCValidationState state;
// during initial block download, DoS ban score should be zero, else 100
EXPECT_CALL(state, DoS(0, false, REJECT_INVALID, "bad-txns-invalid-joinsplit-signature", false)).Times(1);
ContextualCheckTransaction(tx, state, 0, 100);
ContextualCheckTransaction(tx, state, 0, 100, []() { return true; });
EXPECT_CALL(state, DoS(100, false, REJECT_INVALID, "bad-txns-invalid-joinsplit-signature", false)).Times(1);
ContextualCheckTransaction(tx, state, 0, 100, []() { return false; });
}
TEST(checktransaction_tests, OverwinterConstructors) {
@@ -829,8 +835,11 @@ TEST(checktransaction_tests, OverwinterNotActive) {
CTransaction tx(mtx);
MockCValidationState state;
// during initial block download, DoS ban score should be zero, else 100
EXPECT_CALL(state, DoS(0, false, REJECT_INVALID, "tx-overwinter-not-active", false)).Times(1);
ContextualCheckTransaction(tx, state, 1, 100);
ContextualCheckTransaction(tx, state, 1, 100, []() { return true; });
EXPECT_CALL(state, DoS(100, false, REJECT_INVALID, "tx-overwinter-not-active", false)).Times(1);
ContextualCheckTransaction(tx, state, 1, 100, []() { return false; });
}
// This tests a transaction without the fOverwintered flag set, against the Overwinter consensus rule set.

12
src/gtest/test_transaction_builder.cpp
View File

@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ TEST(TransactionBuilder, Invoke)
// 0.0005 t-ZEC in, 0.0004 z-ZEC out, 0.0001 t-ZEC fee
auto builder1 = TransactionBuilder(consensusParams, 1, &keystore);
builder1.AddTransparentInput(COutPoint(), scriptPubKey, 50000);
builder1.AddSaplingOutput(fvk_from, pk, 40000, {});
builder1.AddSaplingOutput(fvk_from.ovk, pk, 40000, {});
auto maybe_tx1 = builder1.Build();
ASSERT_EQ(static_cast<bool>(maybe_tx1), true);
auto tx1 = maybe_tx1.get();
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ TEST(TransactionBuilder, Invoke)
// Check that trying to add a different anchor fails
ASSERT_FALSE(builder2.AddSaplingSpend(expsk, note, uint256(), witness));
builder2.AddSaplingOutput(fvk, pk, 25000, {});
builder2.AddSaplingOutput(fvk.ovk, pk, 25000, {});
auto maybe_tx2 = builder2.Build();
ASSERT_EQ(static_cast<bool>(maybe_tx2), true);
auto tx2 = maybe_tx2.get();
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ TEST(TransactionBuilder, FailsWithNegativeChange)
// Fail if there is only a Sapling output
// 0.0005 z-ZEC out, 0.0001 t-ZEC fee
auto builder = TransactionBuilder(consensusParams, 1);
builder.AddSaplingOutput(fvk, pk, 50000, {});
builder.AddSaplingOutput(fvk.ovk, pk, 50000, {});
EXPECT_FALSE(static_cast<bool>(builder.Build()));
// Fail if there is only a transparent output
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ TEST(TransactionBuilder, ChangeOutput)
{
auto builder = TransactionBuilder(consensusParams, 1, &keystore);
builder.AddTransparentInput(COutPoint(), scriptPubKey, 25000);
builder.SendChangeTo(zChangeAddr, fvkOut);
builder.SendChangeTo(zChangeAddr, fvkOut.ovk);
auto maybe_tx = builder.Build();
ASSERT_EQ(static_cast<bool>(maybe_tx), true);
auto tx = maybe_tx.get();
@@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ TEST(TransactionBuilder, SetFee)
{
auto builder = TransactionBuilder(consensusParams, 1);
ASSERT_TRUE(builder.AddSaplingSpend(expsk, note, anchor, witness));
builder.AddSaplingOutput(fvk, pk, 25000, {});
builder.AddSaplingOutput(fvk.ovk, pk, 25000, {});
auto maybe_tx = builder.Build();
ASSERT_EQ(static_cast<bool>(maybe_tx), true);
auto tx = maybe_tx.get();
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ TEST(TransactionBuilder, SetFee)
{
auto builder = TransactionBuilder(consensusParams, 1);
ASSERT_TRUE(builder.AddSaplingSpend(expsk, note, anchor, witness));
builder.AddSaplingOutput(fvk, pk, 25000, {});
builder.AddSaplingOutput(fvk.ovk, pk, 25000, {});
builder.SetFee(20000);
auto maybe_tx = builder.Build();
ASSERT_EQ(static_cast<bool>(maybe_tx), true);

29
src/gtest/test_upgrades.cpp
View File

@@ -143,6 +143,35 @@ TEST_F(UpgradesTest, IsActivationHeightForAnyUpgrade) {
EXPECT_FALSE(IsActivationHeightForAnyUpgrade(1000000, params));
}
TEST_F(UpgradesTest, NextEpoch) {
SelectParams(CBaseChainParams::REGTEST);
const Consensus::Params& params = Params().GetConsensus();
// Consensus::NetworkUpgrade::NO_ACTIVATION_HEIGHT
EXPECT_EQ(NextEpoch(-1, params), boost::none);
EXPECT_EQ(NextEpoch(0, params), boost::none);
EXPECT_EQ(NextEpoch(1, params), boost::none);
EXPECT_EQ(NextEpoch(1000000, params), boost::none);
UpdateNetworkUpgradeParameters(Consensus::UPGRADE_TESTDUMMY, Consensus::NetworkUpgrade::ALWAYS_ACTIVE);
EXPECT_EQ(NextEpoch(-1, params), boost::none);
EXPECT_EQ(NextEpoch(0, params), boost::none);
EXPECT_EQ(NextEpoch(1, params), boost::none);
EXPECT_EQ(NextEpoch(1000000, params), boost::none);
int nActivationHeight = 100;
UpdateNetworkUpgradeParameters(Consensus::UPGRADE_TESTDUMMY, nActivationHeight);
EXPECT_EQ(NextEpoch(-1, params), boost::none);
EXPECT_EQ(NextEpoch(0, params), static_cast<int>(Consensus::UPGRADE_TESTDUMMY));
EXPECT_EQ(NextEpoch(1, params), static_cast<int>(Consensus::UPGRADE_TESTDUMMY));
EXPECT_EQ(NextEpoch(nActivationHeight - 1, params), static_cast<int>(Consensus::UPGRADE_TESTDUMMY));
EXPECT_EQ(NextEpoch(nActivationHeight, params), boost::none);
EXPECT_EQ(NextEpoch(nActivationHeight + 1, params), boost::none);
EXPECT_EQ(NextEpoch(1000000, params), boost::none);
}
TEST_F(UpgradesTest, NextActivationHeight) {
SelectParams(CBaseChainParams::REGTEST);
const Consensus::Params& params = Params().GetConsensus();