Bugfix: Fix a variety of misspellings
This commit is contained in:
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_banning)
|
||||
CNode dummyNode1(INVALID_SOCKET, addr1, "", true);
|
||||
dummyNode1.Misbehaving(100); // Should get banned
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(CNode::IsBanned(addr1));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(!CNode::IsBanned(ip(0xa0b0c001|0x0000ff00))); // Different ip, not banned
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(!CNode::IsBanned(ip(0xa0b0c001|0x0000ff00))); // Different IP, not banned
|
||||
|
||||
CAddress addr2(ip(0xa0b0c002));
|
||||
CNode dummyNode2(INVALID_SOCKET, addr2, "", true);
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(norecurse)
|
||||
// Should not verify, because it will try to execute OP_INVALIDOPCODE
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(!Verify(scriptSig, p2sh, true));
|
||||
|
||||
// Try to recurse, and verification should succeed because
|
||||
// Try to recur, and verification should succeed because
|
||||
// the inner HASH160 <> EQUAL should only check the hash:
|
||||
CScript p2sh2;
|
||||
p2sh2.SetDestination(p2sh.GetID());
|
||||
@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(is)
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(switchover)
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Test switchover code
|
||||
// Test switch over code
|
||||
CScript notValid;
|
||||
notValid << OP_11 << OP_12 << OP_EQUALVERIFY;
|
||||
CScript scriptSig;
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user