Refactor and replace factory method random() with constructor.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -3,6 +3,8 @@
|
||||
#include "zcash/Address.hpp"
|
||||
#include "zcash/Note.hpp"
|
||||
|
||||
#include "amount.h"
|
||||
#include "random.h"
|
||||
#include "librustzcash.h"
|
||||
|
||||
#include <array>
|
||||
@@ -53,10 +55,10 @@ TEST(SaplingNote, TestVectors)
|
||||
|
||||
TEST(SaplingNote, Random)
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Test creating random notes using the same sk
|
||||
auto sk = SaplingSpendingKey::random();
|
||||
SaplingNote note1 = SaplingNote::random(sk);
|
||||
SaplingNote note2 = SaplingNote::random(sk);
|
||||
// Test creating random notes using the same spending key
|
||||
auto address = SaplingSpendingKey::random().default_address().get();
|
||||
SaplingNote note1(address, GetRand(MAX_MONEY));
|
||||
SaplingNote note2(address, GetRand(MAX_MONEY));
|
||||
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(note1.d, note2.d);
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(note1.pk_d, note2.pk_d);
|
||||
@@ -64,8 +66,7 @@ TEST(SaplingNote, Random)
|
||||
ASSERT_NE(note1.r, note2.r);
|
||||
|
||||
// Test diversifier and pk_d are not the same for different spending keys
|
||||
sk = SaplingSpendingKey::random();
|
||||
SaplingNote note3 = SaplingNote::random(sk);
|
||||
SaplingNote note3(SaplingSpendingKey::random().default_address().get(), GetRand(MAX_MONEY));
|
||||
ASSERT_NE(note1.d, note3.d);
|
||||
ASSERT_NE(note1.pk_d, note3.pk_d);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user