We aint got no JoinSplits around here
This commit is contained in:
@@ -632,7 +632,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(chained_joinsplits)
|
||||
CMutableTransaction mtx;
|
||||
mtx.vjoinsplit.push_back(js2);
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(!cache.HaveJoinSplitRequirements(mtx));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(!cache.HaveShieldedRequirements(mtx));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
{
|
||||
@@ -642,7 +642,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(chained_joinsplits)
|
||||
mtx.vjoinsplit.push_back(js2);
|
||||
mtx.vjoinsplit.push_back(js1);
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(!cache.HaveJoinSplitRequirements(mtx));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(!cache.HaveShieldedRequirements(mtx));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
{
|
||||
@@ -650,7 +650,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(chained_joinsplits)
|
||||
mtx.vjoinsplit.push_back(js1);
|
||||
mtx.vjoinsplit.push_back(js2);
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(cache.HaveJoinSplitRequirements(mtx));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(cache.HaveShieldedRequirements(mtx));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
{
|
||||
@@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(chained_joinsplits)
|
||||
mtx.vjoinsplit.push_back(js2);
|
||||
mtx.vjoinsplit.push_back(js3);
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(cache.HaveJoinSplitRequirements(mtx));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(cache.HaveShieldedRequirements(mtx));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
{
|
||||
@@ -669,7 +669,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(chained_joinsplits)
|
||||
mtx.vjoinsplit.push_back(js2);
|
||||
mtx.vjoinsplit.push_back(js3);
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(cache.HaveJoinSplitRequirements(mtx));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(cache.HaveShieldedRequirements(mtx));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user