Not returning a value at the end of a non-void function is undefined behaviour.
Given that this managed to pass our full test suite, I guess that GCC looks for
un-returned values at the end of a function and uses them as the return value,
if the keyword is missing. Clang OTOH complains, which is how we spotted this:
https://ci.z.cash/#/builders/16/builds/282
Remove now-unshadowed serialization lines that do nothing
Previously we had both nVersion as a class parameter *and* a serialization
argument, and in several inherited serializers the latter was set to the former,
in order to pass the serialized object's version into underlying parsers. #3180
pulled in the upstream changes to clean this up, and in doing so these lines
became no-ops - setting the class parameter to itself. Clang throws warnings on
this, which turn into errors on the MacOS builder.
We can just remove these, because upstream already had done so in earlier PRs,
indicating that they were not being relied on by underlying parsers.
jl777