Use height check for overwinter invalid
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1020,7 +1020,8 @@ bool ContextualCheckTransaction(
|
||||
|
||||
// If Sprout rules apply, reject transactions which are intended for Overwinter and beyond
|
||||
if (isSprout && tx.fOverwintered) {
|
||||
return state.DoS(nHeight < Params().GetConsensus().vUpgrades[Consensus::UPGRADE_OVERWINTER].nActivationHeight ? 0 : dosLevel,error("ContextualCheckTransaction(): ht.%d activates.%d dosLevel.%d overwinter is not active yet",nHeight, Params().GetConsensus().vUpgrades[Consensus::UPGRADE_OVERWINTER].nActivationHeight, dosLevel),REJECT_INVALID, "tx-overwinter-not-active");
|
||||
int32_t ht = Params().GetConsensus().vUpgrades[Consensus::UPGRADE_OVERWINTER].nActivationHeight;
|
||||
return state.DoS((ht < 0 || nHeight < ht) ? 0 : dosLevel,error("ContextualCheckTransaction(): ht.%d activates.%d dosLevel.%d overwinter is not active yet",nHeight, Params().GetConsensus().vUpgrades[Consensus::UPGRADE_OVERWINTER].nActivationHeight, dosLevel),REJECT_INVALID, "tx-overwinter-not-active");
|
||||
//return state.DoS(isInitBlockDownload() ? 0 : dosLevel,error("ContextualCheckTransaction(): ht.%d activates.%d dosLevel.%d overwinter is not active yet",nHeight, Params().GetConsensus().vUpgrades[Consensus::UPGRADE_OVERWINTER].nActivationHeight, dosLevel),REJECT_INVALID, "tx-overwinter-not-active");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user