DragonX/hush3
1
1
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases 1 Wiki Activity

Auto merge of #2014 - arcalinea:test-prioritisetransaction, r=arcalinea

Browse Source 
Test prioritisetransaction

After talking with @str4d about #1884 , I wrote a test for prioritisetransaction. It uses small blocks (11kb), and checks whether a transaction makes it into the next block after being prioritized by that node.

Should this be improved with a larger number of txs in the mempool, or by testing over multiple runs?

As for getblocktemplate(), it seems to return the prioritized transaction within the block size set by the node (about 50 txs fit in an 11kb block), but the block "sizelimit" it displays is set at 2 MB in `rpcmining.cpp` line 690:
```
result.push_back(Pair("sizelimit", (int64_t)MAX_BLOCK_SIZE));
```

This was quite confusing, I didn't think the `-blockmaxsize` parameter I was setting was working for awhile.
This commit is contained in:
zkbot
2017-03-02 06:47:04 +00:00
parent 14711a4a43 8d2dac6e3f
commit 6ee75b3b7b
3 changed files with 129 additions and 1 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

5
qa/rpc-tests/test_framework/mininode.py
View File

@@ -37,8 +37,11 @@ MY_SUBVERSION = "/python-mininode-tester:0.0.1/"
MAX_INV_SZ = 50000
COIN = 100000000 # 1 zec in zatoshis
# Keep our own socket map for asyncore, so that we can track disconnects
# ourselves (to workaround an issue with closing an asyncore socket when
# ourselves (to workaround an issue with closing an asyncore socket when
# using select)
mininode_socket_map = dict()