From 71f2c6969cc6eed6dc35d06d569a2d0792fc7250 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: jl777 Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 11:23:05 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] Revert --- src/main.cpp | 2 +- src/main.h | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/main.cpp b/src/main.cpp index 03e05dbad..829d443ef 100644 --- a/src/main.cpp +++ b/src/main.cpp @@ -4064,7 +4064,7 @@ bool AcceptBlock(CBlock& block, CValidationState& state, CBlockIndex** ppindex, // blocks which are too close in height to the tip. Apply this test // regardless of whether pruning is enabled; it should generally be safe to // not process unrequested blocks. - bool fTooFarAhead = (pindex->nHeight > int(chainActive.Height() + BLOCK_DOWNLOAD_WINDOW));//MIN_BLOCKS_TO_KEEP)); + bool fTooFarAhead = (pindex->nHeight > int(chainActive.Height() + MIN_BLOCKS_TO_KEEP)); // TODO: deal better with return value and error conditions for duplicate // and unrequested blocks. diff --git a/src/main.h b/src/main.h index 221077acb..f52fa222d 100644 --- a/src/main.h +++ b/src/main.h @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static const unsigned int MAX_HEADERS_RESULTS = 160; * Larger windows tolerate larger download speed differences between peer, but increase the potential * degree of disordering of blocks on disk (which make reindexing and in the future perhaps pruning * harder). We'll probably want to make this a per-peer adaptive value at some point. */ -static const unsigned int BLOCK_DOWNLOAD_WINDOW = 1024*16; +static const unsigned int BLOCK_DOWNLOAD_WINDOW = 1024; /** Time to wait (in seconds) between writing blocks/block index to disk. */ static const unsigned int DATABASE_WRITE_INTERVAL = 60 * 60; /** Time to wait (in seconds) between flushing chainstate to disk. */