Sapling keys generated from the seed are not yet persisted, so we don't
want to persist the seed or chain state either, otherwise the wallet
could end up in an inconsistent state.
Some tests are temporarily disabled because commenting out HDSeed
persistence breaks invariants inside CCryptoKeyStore.
Revert this commit during the PR for #3388.
* 'dev' of https://github.com/jl777/komodo: (1062 commits)
Delay PoW check until connect block
Declare
KOMODO_NEWBLOCKS
Prevent autorewind if syncing. Not a critical update
Change n0/n1 size to int32_t
Syntax
Fix n -> static n0/n1
Test
Test
Test
KOMODO_LONGESTCHAIN = height;
Sync main.cpp to jl777
-print
-USD/EUR
readme
curl fix
-print
Fix buffer overflows and reduce KMD men usage
-print
Test
...
Mempool improvements, branch ID awareness
Whenever the local chain tip is updated, transactions in the mempool which commit to an
unmineable branch ID (for example, just before a network upgrade activates, where the
next block will have a different branch ID) will be removed.
Includes commits cherry-picked from the following upstream PRs:
- bitcoin/bitcoin#6654
- Only the mempool index change.
- bitcoin/bitcoin#6776
- bitcoin/bitcoin#7020
- bitcoin/bitcoin#6915
Part of #2074.
Add ability for node to reject tx from mempool by number of tx inputs
Implement short-term solution described in #2343 so that users can respond promptly to critical short-term problems caused by quadratic validation scaling, such as the getblocktemplate latency, block propagation latency, and mempool size inflation issues described in #2333.
Test prioritisetransaction
After talking with @str4d about #1884 , I wrote a test for prioritisetransaction. It uses small blocks (11kb), and checks whether a transaction makes it into the next block after being prioritized by that node.
Should this be improved with a larger number of txs in the mempool, or by testing over multiple runs?
As for getblocktemplate(), it seems to return the prioritized transaction within the block size set by the node (about 50 txs fit in an 11kb block), but the block "sizelimit" it displays is set at 2 MB in `rpcmining.cpp` line 690:
```
result.push_back(Pair("sizelimit", (int64_t)MAX_BLOCK_SIZE));
```
This was quite confusing, I didn't think the `-blockmaxsize` parameter I was setting was working for awhile.
