push fixes to sync PAY

This commit is contained in:
blackjok3r
2019-03-23 15:39:33 +08:00
parent 3bd5bc3232
commit 1f19c7c987

View File

@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ bool PaymentsValidate(struct CCcontract_info *cp,Eval* eval,const CTransaction &
//it is a pay to pubkey vout
//the "pubkey" is just 0x02 <createtxid>
if ( tx.vout.size() < 2 )
return(false);
return(eval->Invalid("not enough vouts"));
if ( tx.vout.back().scriptPubKey[0] == OP_RETURN )
{
scriptpubkey = HexStr(tx.vout[tx.vout.size()-2].scriptPubKey.begin()+2, tx.vout[tx.vout.size()-2].scriptPubKey.end()-1);
@@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ bool PaymentsValidate(struct CCcontract_info *cp,Eval* eval,const CTransaction &
if ( tmptx.vout.size() > 0 && DecodePaymentsOpRet(tmptx.vout[tmptx.vout.size()-1].scriptPubKey,lockedblocks,minrelease,totalallocations,txidoprets) != 0 )
{
if ( lockedblocks < 0 || minrelease < 0 || totalallocations <= 0 || txidoprets.size() < 2 )
return(false);
return(eval->Invalid("negative values"));
Paymentspk = GetUnspendable(cp,0);
//fprintf(stderr, "lockedblocks.%i minrelease.%i totalallocations.%i txidopret1.%s txidopret2.%s\n",lockedblocks, minrelease, totalallocations, txidoprets[0].ToString().c_str(), txidoprets[1].ToString().c_str() );
@@ -222,11 +222,11 @@ bool PaymentsValidate(struct CCcontract_info *cp,Eval* eval,const CTransaction &
// sanity check to make sure we got all the required info
if ( allocations.size() == 0 || scriptPubKeys.size() == 0 || allocations.size() != scriptPubKeys.size() )
return(false);
return(eval->Invalid("missing data cannot validate"));
//fprintf(stderr, "totalallocations.%i checkallocations.%i\n",totalallocations, checkallocations);
if ( totalallocations != checkallocations )
return(false);
return(eval->Invalid("allocation missmatch"));
txidpk = CCtxidaddr(txidaddr,createtxid);
GetCCaddress1of2(cp,coinaddr,Paymentspk,txidpk);
@@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ bool PaymentsValidate(struct CCcontract_info *cp,Eval* eval,const CTransaction &
// make sure change is in vout 0 and is paying to the contract address.
if ( (change= IsPaymentsvout(cp,tx,0,coinaddr)) == 0 )
return(false);
return(eval->Invalid("change is in wrong vout or is wrong tx type"));
// Check vouts go to the right place and pay the right amounts.
int64_t amount = 0, checkamount; int32_t n = 0;
@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ bool PaymentsValidate(struct CCcontract_info *cp,Eval* eval,const CTransaction &
if ( destscriptPubKey != voutscriptPubKey )
{
fprintf(stderr, "pays wrong destination destscriptPubKey.%s voutscriptPubKey.%s\n", destscriptPubKey.c_str(), voutscriptPubKey.c_str());
return(false);
return(eval->Invalid("pays wrong address"));
}
int64_t test = allocations[n];
test *= checkamount;
@@ -253,18 +253,19 @@ bool PaymentsValidate(struct CCcontract_info *cp,Eval* eval,const CTransaction &
if ( test != tx.vout[i].nValue )
{
fprintf(stderr, "vout.%i test.%li vs nVlaue.%li\n",i, test, tx.vout[i].nValue);
return(false);
//return(eval->Invalid("amounts do not match"));
}
amount += tx.vout[i].nValue;
n++;
}
// This is a backup check to make sure there are no extra vouts paying something else!
if ( checkamount != amount )
return(false);
return(eval->Invalid("amounts do not match"));
if ( amount < minrelease*COIN )
{
fprintf(stderr, "does not meet minrelease amount.%li minrelease.%li\n",amount, (int64_t)minrelease*COIN );
return(false);
//return(eval->Invalid("amount is too small"));
}
i = 0;
@@ -274,24 +275,26 @@ bool PaymentsValidate(struct CCcontract_info *cp,Eval* eval,const CTransaction &
if ( myGetTransaction(vin.prevout.hash,txin,blockhash) )
{
// check the vin comes from the CC address's
if ( IsPaymentsvout(cp,txin,i,coinaddr) != 0 )
char destaddr[64];
Getscriptaddress(destaddr,txin.vout[vin.prevout.n].scriptPubKey);
if ( strcmp(destaddr,coinaddr) != 0 )
{
fprintf(stderr, "vin.%i is not a payments CC vout\n", i);
return(false);
fprintf(stderr, "vin.%i is not a payments CC vout: txid.%s vout.%i\n", i, txin.GetHash().ToString().c_str(), vin.prevout.n);
return(eval->Invalid("vin is not paymentsCC type"));
}
// check the chain depth vs locked blcoks requirement.
CBlockIndex* pblockindex = mapBlockIndex[blockhash];
if ( pblockindex->GetHeight() > chainActive.LastTip()->GetHeight()-lockedblocks )
{
fprintf(stderr, "vin.%i is not elegible to be spent yet height.%i vs elegible_ht.%i\n", i, pblockindex->GetHeight(), chainActive.LastTip()->GetHeight()-lockedblocks);
return(false);
return(eval->Invalid("vin not elegible"));
}
//fprintf(stderr, "vin txid.%s\n", txin.GetHash().GetHex().c_str());
}
i++;
}
}
}
} else return(eval->Invalid("create transaction cannot decode"));
} else fprintf(stderr, "cannot get contract txn\n");//return(eval->Invalid("Could not get contract transaction"));
// one of two addresses? only seems to ever use the 1!
// change must go to 1of2 txidaddr
// change is/must be in vout[0]