DragonX/hush3
1
1
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases 1 Wiki Activity

fix better

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
blackjok3r
2019-04-11 19:13:37 +08:00
parent 6178eb87c4
commit a766a16bb3
1 changed files with 10 additions and 10 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

20
src/main.cpp
View File

@@ -4233,22 +4233,22 @@ static bool ActivateBestChainStep(CValidationState &state, CBlockIndex *pindexMo
const CBlockIndex *pindexOldTip = chainActive.Tip();
const CBlockIndex *pindexFork = chainActive.FindFork(pindexMostWork);
// stop trying to reorg if the reorged chain is before last notarized height.
// stay on the same chain tip!
int32_t notarizedht,prevMoMheight; uint256 notarizedhash,txid;
notarizedht = komodo_notarized_height(&prevMoMheight,&notarizedhash,&txid);
if ( pindexFork->GetHeight() < notarizedht )
{
fprintf(stderr,"pindexFork->GetHeight().%d is < notarizedht %d, so ignore it\n",(int32_t)pindexFork->GetHeight(),notarizedht);
return false;
}
// - On ChainDB initialization, pindexOldTip will be null, so there are no removable blocks.
// - If pindexMostWork is in a chain that doesn't have the same genesis block as our chain,
// then pindexFork will be null, and we would need to remove the entire chain including
// our genesis block. In practice this (probably) won't happen because of checks elsewhere.
auto reorgLength = pindexOldTip ? pindexOldTip->GetHeight() - (pindexFork ? pindexFork->GetHeight() : -1) : 0;
assert(MAX_REORG_LENGTH > 0);//, "We must be able to reorg some distance");
int32_t notarizedht,prevMoMheight; uint256 notarizedhash,txid;
notarizedht = komodo_notarized_height(&prevMoMheight,&notarizedhash,&txid);
if ( pindexFork->GetHeight() < notarizedht )
{
fprintf(stderr,"pindexFork->GetHeight().%d is < notarizedht %d, so ignore it\n",(int32_t)pindexFork->GetHeight(),notarizedht);
pindexFork = pindexOldTip;
}
if (reorgLength > MAX_REORG_LENGTH)
if ( reorgLength > MAX_REORG_LENGTH)
{
auto msg = strprintf(_(
"A block chain reorganization has been detected that would roll back %d blocks! "